Moral foundations, worldviews, moral absolutism and belief in conspiracy theories

Authors:
Luigi Leone, Mauro Giacomantonio, Marco Lauriola
Published Online:
06 Sep 2017
DOI:
10.1002/ijop.12459
Volume/Issue No:
Early View Articles

Additional Options

In the present research, we examined whether individual differences in basic moral concerns might be related to a greater endorsement of conspiracy theories. Building on the notion that conspiracy theories often deal with super‐individual relevant events in which a group perspective is central, we proposed that individual differences in moral concerns pertaining to group‐ and community‐concerns (i.e., binding moral foundations) rather than to individual well‐being (i.e., individualising moral foundations) would be positively associated with conspiracy beliefs. We further hypothesised that such relations would be totally mediated by beliefs in a dangerous world and by embracing moral absolutism. We found support for these predictions in two community samples (Ns: 319; 514). Theoretical implications were discussed.

© 2017 International Union of Psychological Science